| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Pornography Victims Compensation Act ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pornography Victims Compensation Act
The Pornography Victims Compensation Act of 1991 was a bill, S. 983,〔'(''Bill Summary & Status Search Results'', in ''THOMAS'' website of ''The Library of Congress'' ), as accessed Sep. 11, 2010.〕 in the U.S. Congress. The sponsor in the Senate was Senator Mitch McConnell〔 with eight cosponsors.〔 A Senate committee held hearings on the bill.〔〔''Legislative Proposals For Compensation of Victims of Sexual Crimes: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary: United States Senate: One Hundred Second Congress: First Session: On the Pornography Victims' Compensation Act of 1991 and the Pornography Victims' Protection Act of 1991'', July 23, 1991, S. Hrg. 102-471 (Serial No. J-102-33) (Washington (): U.S. Government Printing Office 1992), in LexisNexis Congressional Hearings Digital Collection (re bills S. 983 (102d Cong) and S. 1521 (102d Cong)) ((Durable URL )), via http://web.lexis-nexis.com/congcomp/document? . . . (whole URL not preserved) and other LexisNexis URLs, as accessed May 28, 2010.〕 The bill was not voted on, did not pass, and did not become law.
== Legislative substance ==
Under the bill, a person who was attacked after the attacker was substantially spurred by pornography could have been able to sue the pornography's producers, publishers, distributors, exhibitors, and sellers without needing a prior criminal charge against the pornography itself.〔(Reske, Henry J., ''Feminists Back Anti-Porn Bill'', in ''American Bar Association Journal'' (ABAJ), Jun., 1992, vol. 78, p. 32 (ISSN 07470088) (''ProQuest'' database) ), as accessed Jan. 24, 2010, or (alternative link ).〕〔Torrey, Morrison, ''The Resurrection of the Antipornography Ordinance'', in ''Texas Journal of Women and the Law'', vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 116–117 (Winter 1993) (author assoc. prof., De Paul Univ. Coll. of Law).〕 It was written not to prohibit any publication, but to hold liable for certain consequences, according to McConnell.〔 For political pragmatism, the bill was limited to child pornography and obscene material, that being already unprotected by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.〔〔(Puente, Maria, ''Bill Holds Porn Producers Liable For Sex Crimes'', in ''USA Today'', Apr. 15, 1992, p. 09A (Final ed.) (in ''ProQuest'') ), as accessed Jan. 24, 2010, or (alternative link ).〕
As part of the rationale for passage, McConnell argued "that crime is fostered by a culture in which the sexual degradation, abuse, and murder of women and children are a form of entertainment", that "()he connection between the amount of violent entertainment and the amount of real-life violence is no longer seriously doubted among social scientists," that "more than one million children from six months to sixteen years old are sexually molested and then filmed or photographed", and that "()ornography is fueling violence in this country".〔Four quotations: Greco, Albert N., ''The First Amendment, Freedom of the Press, and the Issue of "Harm": A Conundrum for Publishers'', in ''Publishing Research Quarterly'', vol. 11, no. 4, p. 48 & nn. 35–37 (Winter 1995/96) (author clinical assoc. prof., N.Y. Univ.) (article also appears as chap. in ''The Book Publishing Industry in the United States'' (Allyn & Bacon (probably), 1996)).〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pornography Victims Compensation Act」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|